![]() |
|
||||
|
Sigma Imaging (UK) Ltd I just cannot get my head around what they are asking for this lens....?£24,000..........!
![]() : I just could not justify to myself paying this amount of money for a lens...even if i had it...!!!Surely there are cheaper just as good alternatives...!£24.000 ..................................?
|
|
||||
|
If I had the money I would buy it in a second, life's too short to try and justify what you spend. If you can afford it; why deny yourself
![]() Might be able to afford a second hand one when I retire ![]() cheers, John
__________________
Take only photographs, leave only footprints....................................... For wildlife information in the Clyde Recording Area see ... -clydebirds- |
|
|||
|
I know this is an old post, but the price seems to have been reduced to £15,999.99 still seems to be a price the normal guy on the street couldn't afford. They could take off the Hyper Sonic Motor, make it manual - all those twigs etc confuse auto focus anyway - and sell it for a couple of grand.
![]() Bill. |
|
|||
|
No, there isn't. The Hubble Space Telescope is essentiially a Newtonian design and as such uses curved mirrors rather than lenses.
![]() Much like my 500mm lens, the no longer made but much loved Nikkor f8 catadioptric mirror lens. Manual focussing and with a fixed aperture of f8, but a lovely lens to use. I first used it on a Nikon F2SB many years ago and still do so on the D3X. And yes, it was expensive when I got it, but nowhere remotely near the stupid price of this Sigma! on a slightly more prosaic note, I wouldn't be surprised if the Sigma lens is actually built to order. I can't see anyone holding stocks of the thing. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|