![]() |
|
|||
|
I have recently started going different places to do a spot of bird watching. I currently have Nikon D60 with a extra lense, 50mm to 200mm. I am finding this lense not suitable for my new hobby.
What sort of lense could i purchase to attach to this camera or will i need a new camera all together? I also see you can pick up a converter? How do these work and are they worth it if i purchase a strong lense? Hope to get some responses as its a mind field out there and i really don't know where to start ![]() Regards. Julie |
|
||||
|
Hi Julie, welcome to the forum.
I have a D60 which I use when on a long walk as it is light. You are right 200mm is not enough but I would shy away from converters, even if you could find on to fit that lens there would be compatibility issues. Go for as much as you can afford. Sure a bigger/better/faster camera is useful, but 90% of the setup is the lens. You should look for 400mm as a minimum.
__________________
Peter President elect of the Birding UK Dunnock Appreciation Society. |
|
||||
|
Hi Julie if you look at 300mm or 400mm on e-bay the larger the aperture ie 2.4 4.00 they are the best but are more expensive, or if you google lens hire you can hire one for a day/week then you can see the results without laying out a load of money, I found my Sigma lens a lot more studier than the same in Nikon, and not as expensive, best regards mac
|
|
|||
|
hi julie, one thing to watch for if you buy second hand lenses for your D60, the D60 does not have a focus drive motor so you need to look at AFS and AFI lenses if you want autofocus.
Be carefull with teleconverters, they are only compatible with certain lenses. A good lense to consider is the Nikon 70-300 AFS F4.5/F5.6 £430 new approx. Probably the best bugdet glass u can buy. karl |
|
||||
|
I use a Sigma 150-500 zoom on my Nikon D90, very happy with it
although it's heavy, ( I suspect all big lenses are heavy though ). Not the kind of thing you can stroll around with, you need a tripod or be in a hide with a window ledge to steady it on. A converter would be the cheaper option but the optical quality would suffer. As PeterB points out, 400mm is really the minimum useful size. |
|
||||
|
I have Nikon 300mm f4 & use it pretty much all of the time with a Nikon 1.7 converter. It's a fantastic combination & I love it, never take it off my camera (D300)
I don't see any issues with the IQ either I used to use the Nikon 70-300 until I got this, that's a fantastic lens for the money & was my lens of choice.A couple of shots in my gallery & some on my flickr, link in my sig. I also have a photo forum but not sure if i'm allowed to say on here so I wont ![]()
__________________
Stef - My Flickr Last edited by munchycarrot; 21-09-11 at 07:49 PM. |
![]() |
| Bookmarks |
| Thread Tools | |
| Display Modes | |
|
|